The Insolvency Service investigations supervisor David Hill said: “This company appeared to have no intention of providing the services it claimed it could and instead duped customers into paying for service they were never likely to receive and winding it up protects the public from losing more money in this way. “The winding up should serve as a warning that the Insolvency Service will take action to remove rogue companies from the business environment.”
The company failed to file accounts but it is known that £130,000 was taken in deposits and even where refunds were agreed they were never paid. The average customer paid £920 deposit to book their lessons so the number of customers involved and eventually defrauded were quite substantial. It is not clear if criminal charges may follow but the directors Hussain Ahmed and Mohammed Khaled will now be interviewed by the Official Receiver and a full investigation of the directors actions will now follow. The directors can receive disqualifications from 2-15 years, fines and even a jail sentence for the most serious offences. The Insolvency Service was alerted by Islington Trading Standards who had received 40 complaints of services not being provided despite being paid for.
What the Insolvency Service does
The Insolvency Service is a government body and is responsible for all compulsory liquidations (winding up) in the UK via the official receiver. One of the key tasks of the official receiver on behalf of the Insolvency Service is to identify why the company ended in an insolvent liquidation and became insolvent in the first instance. It has a lot of other wide ranging powers from paying redundancy to insolvent company employees to investigating live companies that warrant their attention. You can learn more about the Insolvency Service here http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency.
Failing to file annual returns
Directors should be aware that failing to file accounts with Companies House is a criminal offence so can leave a naïve director with a criminal record and there is no point in blaming the accountant even if it is their fault. Whilst there is no law stating Directors must have qualification as a director you have the responsibility for filing the accounts and you will be expected to demonstrate ‘sufficient levels of skill and knowledge’ to manage the company affairs.
Directors have a legal obligation under the Companies Act 2006 to file annual returns and failure to do so on time will result in escalating fines, dependent on the delays and end in possible personal prosecution of the director and directors' disqualification. It is also worth noting that as a director you also responsible for acting responsibly and complying with other laws too such as
- Employment Law
- Health & safety Law
- Insurance law
- Tax law
- Insolvency law
Failure to comply with these laws can have severe implications for directors and this can range from disqualification from acting as a director to going to jail so if you are in any doubt you should seek relevant professional advice.
Abandoning the company
Simply resigning as a director will not negate any liabilities or responsibilities you may have incurred whilst acting as a director. In any event leaving a company without a director is also a breach of the Companies Act and may lead to the directors being disqualified and investigated as if they had been “liquidated”. The investigation can be instigated by the director of corporate enforcement so abandoning your company should not be considered an option. By abandoning the company you are openly demonstrating disregard or ignorance of the law and either one will not be received well by the Insolvency Service.
The directors have continued to trade and subsequently increased the debts to the company and therefore are likely to be charged with wrongful trading. Wrongful trading is better thought of as irresponsible trading and this would be accurate on the face of it in these circumstances. If proven, wrongful trading can mean the directors being made personally liable for the debts accrued in the time period when the directors knew, or should reasonably have known, the company would end in an insolvent liquidation.
There is also the point of the deposits themselves and clearly they should have been kept separate from the company funds so that customers wanting a refund could have been made easy. By ring-fencing the deposits they also protect customers money from being absorbed into the company account for paying bills and being misused. For example if the customers were told that they can have their money refunded if they were not satisfied then the ‘not isolating’ the potential customer refunds only adds more evidence of misuse of customer deposits. This situation can be made worse if those monies were then used for the director’s personal use. So the simple answer is keep personal and business funds separate, but also keep deposits separate too, possibly in a customer trust account or something similar – ask your bank for more information.
Offering services you do not provide
There may be charges against the directors from Islington Trading Standards for not providing services as advertised.
Generally a company; when advertising goods must:
- Match the description
- Be of satisfactory quality
- Be fit for purpose
Clearly in this case none of the above applied, so there may be a prosecution to follow on this matter, also.
To find out more information about a specific insolvency solution; get business debt advice, or to simply learn a little more about insolvency, in general, please visit our website by clicking here.